Abstracts – Browse Results

Search or browse again.

Click on the titles below to expand the information about each abstract.
Viewing 5 results ...

Belniak, S, Lesniak, A, Plebankiewicz, E and Zima, K (2013) The influence of the building shape on the costs of its construction. Journal of Financial Management of Property and Construction, 18(01), 90-102.

Higgins, D M (2013) The black swan effect and the impact on Australian property forecasting. Journal of Financial Management of Property and Construction, 18(01), 76-89.

Jarkas, A M (2013) Primary factors influencing bid mark-up size decisions of general contractors in Kuwait. Journal of Financial Management of Property and Construction, 18(01), 53-75.

Ke, Y, Ling, F Y Y and Ning, Y (2013) Public construction project delivery process in Singapore, Beijing, Hong Kong and Sydney. Journal of Financial Management of Property and Construction, 18(01), 6-25.

Sundaraj, G and Eaton, D (2013) Quantifying robustness in PFIs. Journal of Financial Management of Property and Construction, 18(01), 26-52.

  • Type: Journal Article
  • Keywords: partnership; PFI; procurement; public private partnership; robustness
  • ISBN/ISSN: 1366-4387
  • URL: https://doi.org/10.1108/13664381311305069
  • Abstract:
    Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to define and quantify the term robustness within the context of a Private Finance Initiative (PFI) project environment from the perspective of the Granting Authority. The paper is conceptual, based on conceptual generalisations. Design/methodology/approach – The paper considers the theory of systems thinking within PFI procurement. This is further integrated with the concept of robustness and resilience used extensively in the ecology discipline. Combining the two, this paper presents a mathematical approach of quantifying robustness in PFI projects. Findings – An analytical model is used to support the mathematical analysis to quantify and define robustness. Research limitations/implications – The quantifying of robustness is based on the principal assumptions presented in the paper. The principal assumptions provide an ideal situation which is necessary to pursue and develop the proposed approach to quantify robustness. Changes to the assumptions may affect the generalisability of the approach. Originality/value – The paper provides a greater definition to robustness within PFI projects and the possibility of quantifying robustness to better monitor and manage the characteristic.